![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
In part one of this article, we looked at the importance of recruiting and developing effective leadership teams. This article will look at two important questions: where should churches look for potential new staff persons and should they be full-time or part-time? When a church needs to add paid staff, where should it look inside or outside the church? There are several good reasons to consider hiring members of your congregation:
Friendship United Methodist Church in Bolingbrook, Illinois, grew its paid staff from five in 1987 to twenty-one in 2001. This was done using a model advocated by Lyle Schaller many years ago of employing part-time lay staff. The church found gifted laypeople who were willing to work for $10 an hour. They were highly committed because they were working for their church. They felt honored that their church asked them to work for it. Schaller's model proved to be very successful in that setting. There is, however, a downside to this potentially ideal arrangement. The biggest argument against hiring from within is that if it does not work out, terminating employment may create a larger rupture in the life of your congregation than if the person had been an outsider. There are also several good reasons to consider hiring someone who does not belong to your church:
When a church expands its staff, should it hire a few full-time staff or several part-time staff? Some advantages of hiring two part-time staff versus one full-time staff person:
The downside of the part-time lay staff model is the difficulty of supervision. When a staff grows to twenty part-time people, it is difficult to properly supervise.
Adding additional staff will have a great impact on your churchÕs ability to be more effective in reaching your community and in making disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ.
Posted 9-1-04.
|
||||||||||||||||||||